Slip and Fall Claims

By Anthony F. Sos, Esq. Managing Partner & Personal Injury Attorney | Dellecker, Wilson, King, McKenna, Ruffier & Sos LLP | Last reviewed: September 2026

Orlando Slip-and-Fall Claims: What Florida Law Requires and When Legal Help May Matter

A fall in a store, hotel, restaurant, apartment complex, theme park, or other property does not automatically create a negligence claim. In Florida, the facts that matter include what caused the fall, who controlled the property, whether the responsible party knew or should have known about the hazard, how long the condition existed, and what evidence can still be preserved.

The most important work often starts before anyone discusses settlement. Floors are cleaned, warning signs are moved, surveillance footage can be overwritten, and witnesses may be difficult to locate later. A strong claim depends on evidence, not simply on the fact that an injury occurred.

This guide explains the Florida rules that commonly govern Orlando slip-and-fall cases, including notice, comparative fault, the two-year filing period, evidence preservation, damages, settlement decisions, and when legal representation may be useful.

A Slip-and-Fall Case Requires More Than Proof That You Fell

Florida premises-liability claims depend on the type of hazard and the legal duty owed by the person or business controlling the property. A fall can happen without anyone being legally negligent.

For a transitory foreign substance in a business establishment, Florida Statute § 768.0755 imposes a specific proof requirement. The injured person must show that the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action to remedy it.

Actual knowledge

Actual knowledge can exist when the business or its employees knew about the condition before the fall – for example, because an employee saw the spill, created it, received a complaint, or had already begun responding to it.

Constructive knowledge

Constructive knowledge may be shown with circumstantial evidence that the dangerous condition existed long enough that the business should have discovered it through ordinary care, or that the condition occurred with such regularity that it was foreseeable.

This is why details such as footprints through a spill, cart tracks, drying edges, inspection logs, recurring leaks, cleaning schedules, and surveillance video may matter.

Not Every Premises Case Is a “Spill on the Floor” Case

Section 768.0755 is aimed specifically at transitory foreign substances in business establishments. Other premises-liability cases can involve broken stairs, defective railings, uneven walking surfaces, poor lighting, unsafe pool areas, elevator or escalator conditions, negligent security, or other property hazards.

The applicable duty can depend on the visitor’s legal status and who possessed or controlled the property. A claim against a store may be different from one involving a landlord, property manager, contractor, theme park, condominium association, or governmental entity.

Florida Generally Gives Two Years to File a Negligence Action

Florida Statute § 95.11 currently provides a two-year limitations period for an action founded on negligence. That generally includes ordinary slip-and-fall and premises-liability negligence claims.

Different rules can apply in special situations, including claims involving government defendants, wrongful death, minors, or other statutory causes of action. The filing deadline should therefore be checked against the specific facts rather than assumed from a general article.

Comparative Fault Can Reduce or Bar Recovery

Florida follows a modified comparative-fault rule. Under § 768.81, damages in a negligence action are reduced by the claimant’s percentage of fault. A claimant found more than 50% responsible for their own harm may not recover damages in an ordinary negligence action covered by the statute.

In a fall case, the defense may argue that the hazard was open and obvious, that the person was distracted, ignored a warning, was running, or otherwise contributed to the incident. Those arguments should be tested against the scene evidence rather than accepted automatically.

Evidence Often Determines Whether a Slip-and-Fall Claim Is Viable

The condition that caused a fall may disappear within minutes. For that reason, evidence preservation can matter more in a premises case than broad arguments about fairness.

  • photos and video showing the exact hazard and surrounding area;
  • surveillance footage from the property or nearby businesses;
  • incident reports and employee statements;
  • names and contact information for witnesses;
  • inspection, cleaning, maintenance, and repair records;
  • prior complaints or evidence that the condition happened repeatedly;
  • the shoes and clothing worn at the time, when relevant;
  • medical records documenting the injuries and timing of treatment; and
  • wage records, receipts, and other proof of financial losses.

For more on video evidence in retail premises cases, see Find Attorneys’ guide to surveillance footage in store-accident claims.

Prompt Medical Care Helps Separate Injury Evidence From Guesswork

Medical treatment serves two purposes: it addresses the injury and creates a contemporaneous record of symptoms, diagnosis, restrictions, and follow-up recommendations. Delayed treatment does not automatically defeat a claim, but it can create disputes over whether the fall caused the later-reported condition.

A claimant should accurately describe symptoms and how the fall occurred without exaggerating or guessing. Medical records that remain consistent over time are often more useful than broad statements made later during a claim.

Insurance Adjusters Are Evaluating the Claim, Not Acting as Personal Advisers

An insurer may ask for a recorded statement, photographs, medical records, prior medical information, authorizations, or other documentation. Some requests are routine; others may be broader than necessary for the issue being evaluated.

Before providing a broad medical authorization or signing a release, a claimant should understand what information is being requested, what claims are being released, and whether treatment is complete enough to evaluate future losses.

Case Example: Why Published Results Need Context

Firm-reported, anonymized result. DWK Law publishes a $2.7 million settlement for a 45-year-old Central Florida woman who suffered permanent injuries after a driver ran a stop sign. The firm reports injuries to multiple areas of the body and loss of earning capacity. The published case-results page does not identify the client or disclose all settlement details.

This was a pedestrian/vehicle matter, not a slip-and-fall case. It is included only as a first-party example of how documented permanent injuries and earning-capacity losses can affect the damages analysis in a serious injury claim. It should not be used to estimate the value of an Orlando premises case.

Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in another case.

People comparing how local firms explain Florida premises claims may also encounter DWK Law’s page for an Orlando slip and fall attorney. A private law-firm page can provide local context, but legal standards, filing deadlines, and fault rules should be checked against Florida statutes, court decisions, and the evidence in the individual case.

When Legal Help May Be Useful

A lawyer is not necessary for every minor fall or insurance question. Legal representation may be more useful when:

  • the injury is serious, permanent, or still being evaluated;
  • the business denies knowing about the hazard;
  • surveillance footage or inspection records need to be preserved quickly;
  • the property owner, tenant, contractor, or manager disputes who controlled the area;
  • the insurer argues that the injured person was mostly at fault;
  • multiple insurance policies or responsible parties may apply;
  • future treatment or lost earning capacity is uncertain; or
  • a settlement or release is offered before the long-term effects are clear.

Contingency Fees: Read the Agreement, Not the Marketing Slogan

Many Florida personal injury lawyers use contingency-fee agreements, meaning the attorney fee is tied to a recovery rather than billed by the hour. But the older draft went too far by saying there is categorically “no cost” unless the case is won.

A written fee agreement should explain the percentage fee, litigation costs, medical-record expenses, expert fees, filing costs, lien issues, and whether the client could owe any costs if there is no recovery. Florida Bar rules regulate contingency-fee agreements, but the actual contract controls the client-lawyer fee relationship. Florida Bar Rule 4-1.5 – fees and contingency agreements

Questions to Ask Before Hiring an Orlando Slip-and-Fall Lawyer

  • Does Florida Statute § 768.0755 apply to this hazard?
  • What evidence should be preserved immediately?
  • Who controlled the area where the fall occurred?
  • What facts could establish actual or constructive notice?
  • Could comparative fault reduce or bar the claim?
  • What filing deadline applies?
  • What medical evidence is still needed before discussing settlement?
  • How are attorney fees and case expenses handled?
  • Who will personally manage the case?
  • What facts make the claim stronger or weaker?

For broader Florida-specific guidance, see Find Attorneys’ overview of rights in Florida slip-and-fall cases.

Authorities & Sources

Disclaimer

This article provides general legal information and is not legal advice. Florida premises-liability standards, notice requirements, filing deadlines, comparative fault, damages, fee agreements, and insurance issues depend on the facts and applicable law. Statutes and court decisions can change. Reading this article or following a link does not create an attorney-client relationship. Anyone with a potential claim should verify current law and obtain advice appropriate to the specific circumstances.

Anthony F. Sos, Esq.

Anthony F. Sos, Esq. is a Florida personal injury attorney and managing partner at Dellecker, Wilson, King, McKenna, Ruffier & Sos LLP in Orlando. He earned his B.A. in Legal Studies from the University of Central Florida and his J.D. from the University of Florida College of Law. Sos is admitted throughout Florida and multiple federal courts and has handled personal injury, wrongful death, medical malpractice, vehicle accident, and other complex civil litigation matters.