Minnesota Supreme Court Issues Rare Writ of Prohibition

On July 29, 2020, the Minnesota Supreme Court handed down a rare writ of prohibition in a unanimous order. The order – issued in the case In re: B.H. v. Cengiz Gino Yildirim – overturned an order from the lower court requiring the alleged victim of sexual assault to hand over her cell phone for analysis to the defense.

Issuing a writ of this nature during the pre-trial stage of a Minneapolis Criminal Defense case is highly unusual. While a number of advocacy groups celebrated the decision as a victory for victim’s rights, the writ raises serious questions about the accused’s right to prepare a proper defense in the age of digital technology. These matters were further complicated by the Supreme Court’s finding that later attempts by the defendant to establish a viable need to analyze the alleged victim’s device were not timely raised.

The Facts

The case in question stems from an act of criminal sexual conduct the defendant is accused to have committed on December 9, 2018. According to the court record, the complaining witness B.H. attended a concert with friends during the evening of December 8. Following the concert, B.H. went to a bar and consumed alcohol with friends. When B.H. returned to a friend’s house to sleep, she allegedly woke in the early hours of December 9 to find Cengiz Gino Yildirim touching her. B.H. alleges that she was assaulted three separate times during the night and awoke in the morning to discover Yildirim was gone.

The following morning, B.H. took photos with her phone of Yildirim’s watch on a nearby nightstand. She also photographed blood smears on the sheets. B.H. disclosed the alleged attack the friends, went to the hospital for a sexual assault examination, and reported her allegations to law enforcement. According to B.H., she also communicated with Yildirim about the allegations using the social media platform Instagram. Prior to Yildirim’s arrest, police extracted some digital evidence from B.H.’s cell phone before returning it to her on the same day.

Law enforcement issued criminal charges against Yildirim on March 27, 2019.

Case History

The procedural history of the case prior to the issuance of the writ is extensive despite the fact that a trial has yet to commence. In May of 2019, Yildirim sought the disclosure of “books, papers, documents, photographs, law enforcement office reports, [and] tangible objects which relate to the case.” Later, Yildirim specifically requested that the complaining witness submit her cell phone to an independent forensic inspection. Yildirim also sought the forensic data recovered from the phone by the police. Instead, the State provided Yildirim with a sort of digital timeline of data from the phone, but only for the four-day range between December 7, 2018 and December 10, 2018. This range covered the two days prior to the alleged assault as well as the day that followed.

In November of 2019, Yildirim moved to compel production of the cell phone. While the State and defense initially resolved the motion with an agreement that the State would provide the rest of the data they collected, Yildirim moved to compel again due to the insufficiency of the provided data. On December 12, 2019, the trial court ordered B.H. to turn over the phone, which she failed to do.

Weeks later, Yildirim moved to subpoena the phone pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 22.01. The motion sought a subpoena covering “cell phone activity” from November 19, 2018 through March 27, 2019. The court granted Yildirim’s motion, and the defense served the subpoena on B.H.

B.H. moved to quash the motion, arguing that Yildirim’s request was unreasonable. Specifically, B.H. alleged the request fails to show any relevance, specificity, or materiality. At the hearing, Yildirim argued that the limited data recovered from the phone points to additional contacts between B.H. and the police and others. Yildirim alleged B.H. had changed her story over time, and that the cell data could present a different version of her story depending on who B.H. talked to.

B.H. then filed a notice of appeal as well as a motion staying the subpoena. At the hearing for the stay, Yildirim filed an addendum to his brief laying out specific reasoning for the request. Yildirim’s addendum points to “at least three instances” where B.H. allegedly made prior false allegations of sexual assault and also argues the cell data could point to inconsistencies between B.H.’s original report and the statements she made to friends. The trial court denied a motion to stay. B.H. then filed a petition for a writ of prohibition which was denied by the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court then took up the matter.

The Reasoning of the Supreme Court

The Minnesota Supreme Court disagreed with both the trial court and the Court of Appeals, agreeing that the request for the cell phone was unreasonable. In their order, the Supreme Court found that the court’s issuance of the subpoena for the complaining witness’ cell phone was unauthorized by law.

The Court acknowledged that while prior decisions had upheld the use of in camara review of confidential information belonging to the complaining witness, it also held that cell phone data was different. The Court cited U.S. Supreme Court decision Riley v. California in holding that “cell phones differ in both a quantitative and qualitative sense from other objects.” Given the ability to reconstruct the private details of a person’s life from a cell phone, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that subpoenas for this digital data is held to a higher standard. The Court ruled that Yildirim failed to make the case that the request for the subpoena was reasonable, and granted the writ of prohibition.

Future Questions

In a footnote on Page 8 of the decision, the Supreme Court notes that Yildirim attempted to augment his explanation of the need for a subpoena. B.H. filed a motion to strike the addendum that addressed specific reasons behind the request, and the Supreme Court agreed that the addendum was improper. The end result is that the court did not consider the additional argument from Yildirim regarding the necessity of the cell phone data.

Would that additional argument have made any difference? There is no way to be certain. However, potential evidence of prior false sexual assault allegations or specific inconsistent statements is unquestionably relevant to Yildirim’s defense. It remains to be seen if the Supreme Court would rule similarly in a case where the defense made a timely, complete case for the relevance of the cell phone data.

Gerald Miller is a top-notch and experienced Minneapolis DWI lawyer at Gerald Miller P.A. in Minneapolis, MN. He has more than 35 years of experience in Criminal Defense practice. He has also been a mentor to numerous DUI/DWI defense attorneys.

Extraditing Cyber Criminals in India: Need of The Hour

In the recent past, the cyber crimes have become more threatening for individuals, corporates, institutions and nations. In such times, the law enforcement agencies are finding it difficult to check and prevent the crimes in the cyberspace as the perpetrators of the cyber-world are tough to crack and while it incurs a very low cost to carry out a cybercrime, the cost of cracking down or even prevention is extremely high. Read more

Ramesh Keshav is a law student of iilsindia.

Fight Wrongful Termination with Contract Litigation Lawyers in West Palm Beach

Jonathan Evans, the former City Manager of Riviera Beach, recently filed a lawsuit against the city of Riviera Beach and three individual members of city council.

In his lawsuit, Evans, who was fired by the city council last September, claims that he was denied separation pay and unable to clear his name from allegations of malfeasance. He also claims that the city accused him of malfeasance to avoid paying him a severance package, and that three council members conspired to fire him in retaliation for internal investigations he had initiated. Read more

Find top rated attorneys and law firms profiles with Find Attorneys Directory  Publish articles here as other bloggers are doing.

Contract Litigation Lawyers in West Palm Beach Explain Everything You Need to Know about Employment Contracts

Lauren Hills resigned from her on-air reporting job at WPEC News in West Palm Beach, Florida in 2016. When she left,she still had 11 months remaining on her contract, which included a liquidated damage clause. She was aware of the clause, but since she was leaving the industry entirely, as opposed to taking an offer from a competing station, she didn’t think it applied. Read more

Find top rated attorneys and law firms profiles with Find Attorneys Directory  Publish articles here as other bloggers are doing.

After-effects of Divorce on Debt Consolidation

How Will Divorce Affect My Debt Consolidation?

A divorce can be lethal for your emotional and financial health. It can increase your stress level and jeopardize your plan to pay off debts with a debt consolidation plan.

Debt consolidation is a broad term people use to imply the following things: Read more

Stacy B Miller is the content writer and editor at Oak View Law Group whose work has been featured in various blogs and websites. She works to eliminate the stigma of debt and show readers the best options for handling their own debt. Beyond writing about debt, Stacy enjoys cooking and traveling.

Can You Get in Trouble for Driving While High on Marijuana?

Ohio law treats driving while impaired by marijuana the same as driving under the influence of alcohol. State statutes refer to both alleged criminal offenses as operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OVI), and courts impose the same types of penalties regardless of whether a person gets convicted of driving while drunk or high. Read more

Find top rated attorneys and law firms profiles with Find Attorneys Directory, the best and free online attorney directory. Guest bloggers can also publish their articles here as other bloggers are doing.

Which OPERS Retirement Plan is Best

The Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) offers three types of plans. Which is the best for you will depend on your circumstances and how involved you want to be in controlling how money put toward retirement and possible long-term disability is invested. Considerations to take include your age, whether you are married, whether you have children, your expected expenses after you turn 65, and if you have one or more health conditions that could force you to stop working before you reach retirement age. Read more

Find top rated attorneys and law firms profiles with Find Attorneys Directory, the best and free online attorney directory. Guest bloggers can also publish their articles here as other bloggers are doing.

What to Do if Your Vehicle is Repossessed

We all depend on transportation to get us to work, run errands, and more. For most of us, that means having a dependable vehicle that can get us from point A to point B. Unfortunately, vehicle repossession is a real threat for many families. Read more

Find top rated attorneys and law firms profiles with Find Attorneys Directory, the best and free online attorney directory. Guest bloggers can also publish their articles here as other bloggers are doing.

The Do’s And Don’ts Of Hiring a Calgary Divorce Lawyer MM Law

Divorce can be a life-shattering event, and many people don’t handle it well. When the divorce proceedings follow, you want to know you will be protected by a qualified and knowledgeable Calgary divorce lawyer. The right family law firm can tirelessly advocate for you and your children while in the courtroom. Never try to represent yourself because you stand to lose a lot without the right representation, and divorce will almost always have emotional ties that can fog your judgment: Read more

Find top rated attorneys and law firms profiles with Find Attorneys Directory, the best and free online attorney directory. Guest bloggers can also publish their articles here as other bloggers are doing.

A Comprehensive Guide to the Provisions of Compensation for Land Acquisition in Australia

Australia is a big country with six states and two territories. They are New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, Victoria. (North and Australian capital. The total area of Australia is 768 million hectares with a population of 2.41 crores people. Read more

Michael Birch  is a senior Corporate & Civil lawyer at Law office of Sydney, Australia and focuses his practices in the areas of Building Construction Law, Civil Litigation, Commercial Contracts, Commercial Litigation, Domestic and Commercial Conveyancing, Probate, Mediations, Conciliations and Arbitrations. Mr Michael has extensive knowledge in real estate development, real estate finance, real estate lending, asset management, asset purchase and sales, commercial leasing, mixed-use development and planned communities, including condominium ownership.